![]() The 2 1/4 negatives were exposed with a Hasselblad and some with a Twin Lens Reflex with Nikkor lens. Frankly, the first one I printed on the larger size ( using my Epson 2200 printer) I was concerned that I may be wasting the paper and ink - but to my surprise, it was excellent. Also, some of these are printed on two sheets of 13 x 19 which produced (when mounted) very nice 26 x 19 photos. I have printed many of the 2 1/4 x 2 1/4 scanned images on 13 x 19 Photo paper. 35mm are good up through 8 x 10 printing but has to be an excellent source media for printing larger photos. I use VueScan scanning software and I have scanned 35mm thru 4x5 negatives (from the past 55 years) and I get good printed photo results. Surely the newer Epson flatbed scanners are better than the previous models such as my 2450 scanner. Plan is to print 16 by 20s (or so) on my Epson 4800. Photoshop, but I'd hope to get throught them quickly. Retouching am I likely to need? The negatives are in glasines, but (for starters, anyway), how efficient will it be, and how much I'd like to tutn them into digital files,Īnd I have been torn over whether to have them commercially scanned I have inherited a huge set of 6-by-7 negatives that my father I'm thinking of going for the nikon 9000 MF scanner, but I remain Nonetheless - the 4990 keeps my medium format film gear working.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |